Over 59073
politifake

Fall Politics


O- BAAAA-MAAAAA - self-explanatory




CHEERLEADER-IN-CHIEF - Watching football on TV, he chokes on a pretzel, faints and busts his face. This was the charismatic 'leader' who pissed off the world with his 'War On Terror.' Only in America.




"THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD IS PEACEFUL" - And her husband is faithful too


TAGS: arab spring american fall
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by JGalt

JGalt - September 15, 2012, 6:37 pm
not exactly, but she's helping to bring them to power... http://www.prophecynewswatch.com/2012/July17/172.html
Reality Lord - September 15, 2012, 10:07 am

did she actually make that comment about the muslim brotherhood?
GrouchoMarxist - September 15, 2012, 6:31 am
Stealing


Liberals -




FOREIGN POLICY - oh- now it all makes sense!




MARXIST NARCISSIST IN CHIEF OBAMA - Honors Fallen SEALs By Sending Their Parents a Form Letter Signed By Electric Pen (Don't let the door hit your a** after this November)




GLOBAL WARMING ALARMISTS - Run around screaming before you check the facts and you'll get burned every tiem.




SUMMER OF RECOVERY - Obama: $787 billion will save or create 3.5 million jobs. Heritage Foundation: Says Obama is short by only 7.3 million jobs




LATEST POLL NUMBERS - The chosen one isn't so chosen any longer!




LIBERAL TRUTH #1 - disclaimer: Only applies to other liberals. Others: only applicable as convenient, or we are not offended, otherwise, you have no rights.




Liberals -




Clinton on Weiner -




memorial day -




TELEPROMPTER - FAIL




POOR LIBYA -




Obama has definately made his mark -




First scientists were wrong about butter -


TAGS: scientists are not infallible
Rating: 4.64/5

More politifakes by OTC

OTC - July 11, 2014, 1:31 am
Like people not understanding the difference between old and new testaments?
fauxnews - July 5, 2014, 6:13 pm
...just like there is always a chance you could win a $1000 in the lottery. But, again, probability might make you rethink your decision in how to spend your time and $$$ (when taking into account this example).
fauxnews - July 5, 2014, 6:12 pm
And,so far,there has been no REAL evidence to disprove the theory about man-made climate change. The theory so far stands.If you'd like, throw out some arguments against, and I will show you the data.But, yes, there is always a chance it could be wrong...
fauxnews - July 5, 2014, 6:10 pm
That right there is where you screwed up. You never NEVER conclusively prove anything when you get down to it. That's why even atoms are still referred to as atomic theory.But so far,it's probability for truth is high.Why?No evidence so far to disprove it
Curlyrocks - July 5, 2014, 6:08 pm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UhtITYmL9a0 (my favorite episode)
Curlyrocks - July 5, 2014, 6:02 pm
argument needs to learn more about the scientific method than ours.
Curlyrocks - July 5, 2014, 6:02 pm
have been SCIENTIFICALLY proven using the most basic element of the scientific method, cause and effect. He was mocked about his science for saying the truth. You can't and never will prove man made CO2 is causing global warming. Your side of this .......
Curlyrocks - July 5, 2014, 5:58 pm
ok terror you stoped me from my 1st rant, but you started a whole new one. a few days ago there was a poster mocking a man who said that there was a problem with fine particulates, NO(X), SO(X) and other REAL problems with the environment that can and ...
OTC - July 4, 2014, 9:54 pm
Thanks m8
fauxnews - July 4, 2014, 5:33 pm
Well…Happy B-day nevertheless. :-)
OTC - July 4, 2014, 4:38 pm
No, but close
fauxnews - July 4, 2014, 12:02 pm
Happy Bday, OTC! :-) You were born on the 4th?
OTC - July 4, 2014, 8:51 am
Some people are deaf and blind
Zeitguy - July 3, 2014, 11:31 pm
OTC, Your point is loud and clear .
OTC - July 3, 2014, 9:49 pm
Thanks for proving my point
foxrecon19d - July 3, 2014, 9:47 pm
unless, of course, the examples of fraud are actually your own talking points
fauxnews - July 3, 2014, 8:31 pm
People who don't get that basic point lose the argument before they even open their mouths. Well said...
fauxnews - July 3, 2014, 8:30 pm
Exactly TA. Science isn't wrong. Just people. Especially those that don't understand or respect the scientific method. Certainly those who think fallacies, superstition, and religious emotion are suitable refutations against scientific data.
terroraustralis - July 3, 2014, 8:19 pm
and when people take examples of frauds being caught, and claim them to be proof that science is wrong, it pisses me off, because its proof that they have no f***ing idea what they're talking about, and yet people will believe them.
terroraustralis - July 3, 2014, 8:18 pm
this isnt about global warming, its about people not understanding the scientific method. frauds being discovered and theories being disproven is how we know science is working, because the frauds are being caught.
fauxnews - July 3, 2014, 6:25 pm
LOL
Curlyrocks - July 3, 2014, 6:23 pm
Terror please don't tempt me to start the whole comparison rant on GW vs religion. Like everything else to do with GW no one changes their opinion and everyone gets p!ssed off when I go off.
terroraustralis - July 3, 2014, 4:52 pm
"first god wrote the old testament, and was wrong about everything, so he wrote the new testament, so he must be wrong this time too!" - OTC logic in action
Zeitguy - July 3, 2014, 3:26 pm
The "they" you speak of is science. And the only goal of science is to further refine theories by way of repeatable experimentation and deductive reasoning. Your poster is a great example of a logical fallacy.


FREEDOM OF SPEECH LIBERAL DEMOCRAT STYLE -




WE ALL FALL DOWN (VARIATION ON A THEME) -


TAGS: we all fall down
Rating: 4.29/5

More politifakes by foxrecon19d

foxrecon19d - August 30, 2014, 2:04 pm
*T a p s*...
foxrecon19d - August 30, 2014, 2:04 pm
***s... as beautiful, as haunting, as bittersweet, as solemn as that tune is, I hate it with a passion. It reminds me that brothers and sisters are not coming home. To drown it out while I am at a memorial, I hear Martika's Toy Soldiers song in my head...


GAY MARRIAGE - Forget the economy Concentrate on social issues How is that working politicians?




QUICK! NAME THE FOUNDING FATHERS - Such a task would've been very easy for most students from 50 to 200 years ago. Today's students couldn't name half of them, no thanks to the efforts of bad teachers that don't want them to learn such things.




OBAMA:'I'VE BEEN LEFT AT THE ALTAR A COUPLE OF TIMES NOW' - Niagara Falls : Same-sex couples rush to say 'I do' !




OBAMA - working in South America while bombs fall in Libya




NUCLEAR MELTDOWN - As we can see, effects from the readiation are already being noticed...




CONSERVATIVE LOGICAL FALLACY -


TAGS: gun control conservative republican fallacy
Rating: 3.4/5

More politifakes by Cannabal

ipaprime - January 19, 2013, 1:45 am
quite true.
Cannabal - January 19, 2013, 1:38 am
Which is why I am quizzical: how did a video game ever kill anyone?
ipaprime - January 18, 2013, 9:06 pm
a gun by itself cannot kill. it takes the person using it to kill


CONSERVATISM - This photo is an example of the best way to bring nothing but logic and facts to a rational discussion on ideology.


TAGS: wantonly tenders fallacies obsessively
Rating: 2.71/5

More politifakes by crankyhead

crankyhead - July 3, 2013, 1:15 pm
This was actually a tribute to you, fox.
foxrecon19d - July 1, 2013, 8:24 pm
This ph**o is the best example of CRANKYHEAD reacting to logic and facts presented to his illogical whining about ideology
crankyhead - March 27, 2013, 8:00 am
Or if you prefer, you could always check out the last conversation you had, over at religifake.
Renza - March 27, 2013, 7:59 am
Judging by the body language and facial expressions, he's probably not a liberal, more likely a conservative... I'm guessing tea party.
crankyhead - March 27, 2013, 7:59 am
Check the forums out IPA, the poster is factually accurate.
ipaprime - March 27, 2013, 12:44 am
and here i thought that was a liberal
PapaFox - March 26, 2013, 8:48 pm
:-D


SOCIALISM - I wonder- do Republicans know what this means or is it just an appeal to emotion?




liberal science -




Weapons-Grade Global Warming Stupidity -




FLASHBACK: Joe Biden On Iraq In 2010 -




Global Warming Junk Science -




Obama's 'Successful' ISIS Strategy -




Wacky Warmists -




Climate Change Clown -




gives speech in Dallas over slain officers -




Remember Our Fallen -




Smelly Beavers: An Existential Threat To the Planet -




Another FAILED Global Warming Prediction -




Warmist Stupidity On Display -




It's So Easy A Radroach Could Do It! -




The Gold Standard For Global Warming Failure -




Lest They Forgot -




anecdotal evidence -




political centrifuge -




white flakes -




SCOTUS care -




brain falls out -




Risible Climate Alarmism From the Cult Of Climatology -




rules for radicals, rule number 5 -




Bulverism -


TAGS: red herring circular reasoning genetic fallcy scream racist ad hominem
Rating: 4.43/5

More politifakes by calron

calron - January 30, 2016, 3:46 pm
For instance, claiming people are concerned about classified emails on Hillary's server are just partisans or those that don;t like Obama's policies are really racists doesn't replace the original argument, but instead attacks the arguer instead.
calron - January 30, 2016, 3:43 pm
No, as a strawman replaces the given argument with another and then refutes the new argument. This one just a**umes the original is wrong then side tracks with irrelevant reason on why the arguer holds the position.
Cyberhagen - January 30, 2016, 12:05 pm
Isn't that just a strawman argument?


Typical Warmist -




Global Warming Hysterians: Not So Good At Math -


TAGS: global warming hysterians climate change junk science global warming hoax warmists green religion greenies alarmists al gore ipcc radical environmentalism eco fascism epa thugs the sky is falling greenpeace stupidity algore manbearpig
Rating: 4.27/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

fauxnews - May 1, 2015, 11:26 pm
You are correct: It has been "a long time" since you had a "math class." Also, if you had a science class, I shutter at the grade you got. Then there is the reading & writing class, ie. did you actually "read" this study? 1L for sheer ignorance


By Hook or by Crook -




SCIENTIFIC CONSENSUS -


TAGS: climate change challenge fallacy methodology
Rating: 3.81/5

More politifakes by Oldsod

rebeccaolsen - March 31, 2015, 4:25 pm
ts;dc
OTC - March 31, 2015, 4:13 pm
Did you read a scientific consensus on that somewhere?
rebeccaolsen - March 31, 2015, 3:29 pm
Would you like salt with that foot? ShoOTCer McGavin’s big mouth FTW :) You could eat bananas sideways with that thing
OTC - March 31, 2015, 2:32 pm
Tell me, how can you lose an argument on climate change when the refuted statements are name calling and personal attacks?
OTC - March 31, 2015, 2:28 pm
and you don't even notice it?
OTC - March 31, 2015, 2:27 pm
Not sure if you're jealous because I haven't called you sweet cheeks, but it's funny all the hatred spewing from becky is ignored, but I make one comment and I'm the bad guy? You people are warped or maybe hateful comments are just part of your vocabulary
fauxnews - March 31, 2015, 1:42 pm
...then again,OTC,you once said in an debate you are a woman and then oddly retracted that when it didnt serve your argument.So,on gender,we're not sure about you :-/ Guess a woman calling another woman"babe"is just friendly banter.Chat you later,lass X-D
fauxnews - March 31, 2015, 1:34 pm
Really,mate? I dont always hear you call people on this forum "sweet cheeks" in an argument,OTC, but when you do...I know you just lost an argument about climate change with 'a woman.' =) It was bothering YOU enough to resort to chauvinistic responses...
OTC - March 31, 2015, 11:45 am
Maybe some day the scientific consensus will change and tell you that eating chemicals are bad for you, but until then, bon appetite
OTC - March 31, 2015, 11:34 am
Eating chemicals, could be why so many people are sick with cancer, diabetes, heart disease, and other illnesses, but don't question anything, just believe whatever you're told and drink your kool-aid
OTC - March 31, 2015, 11:30 am
and eventually the consensus changed, not because I "stuck to my guns" ( what an asinine comment ), but the continued research changed.
OTC - March 31, 2015, 11:26 am
Um, faux, you're the one that 'dropped in' project much? just making a point that while so many believed the scientific consensus on but.ter and were eating a bunch of chemicals called margarine, I wasn't because I questioned the consensus & ate but.ter
fauxnews - March 31, 2015, 2:20 am
Rebecca "FTW" ;-)
fauxnews - March 31, 2015, 2:20 am
And as if on cue to prove her point,OTC drops in to utter the sort of antiquated ***ist remark you would only expect to hear from the out-of-touch chauvinistic villain of "Happy Gilmore." You are not doing yourself any favors "Shooter", uh, I mean OTC ;-)
OTC - March 31, 2015, 1:48 am
Didn't take credit for anything sweet cheeks, read a little slower and maybe you'll see a comparison with that consensus and the MMCC consensus
rebeccaolsen - March 31, 2015, 1:01 am
You're taking credit for a change in a scientific consensus about b***er,because you stuck to your "guns"? Hmmm, don’t know about any of that.But what I do know is true is that you are rapidly becoming the 'Shooter McGavin' of the politifake community. :)
OTC - March 31, 2015, 12:15 am
I guess they realized that electroshock therapy was creating too many liberal offspring?
OTC - March 31, 2015, 12:12 am
Just like the scientific consensus that but.ter was bad for you. I didn't buy into that and continued to eat but.ter, and now the scientific consensus is but.ter is now good for you. imagine that, the consensus changed


scientific consensus -




cum hoc ergo propter hoc -


TAGS: pirates global warming fallacy
Rating: 3/5

More politifakes by calron

calron - March 28, 2015, 3:31 pm
Thanks the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster.
Oldsod - March 28, 2015, 3:27 pm
Heheheh...


Iowa poll -




intelligent falling -




EPA -




Hasty generalization -




liberals Quintessentially Using Illogical Notions -




scientists: -


TAGS: scientific consensus pluto is isnt is a planet climate change fallacies
Rating: 1.96/5

More politifakes by OTC

Zeitguy - June 23, 2015, 9:20 pm
A nomenclature debate vs AGW? Your thread of logic is amazing.


PREV PAGE